FOOTBALL · THE CONVERSATION STARTS HERE

The Viessmann-Bayern deal closed: criticism, a lot of money, but above all, questions that are raised

Story updated

The story in brief

6-second read

Bayern Munich's recently closed deal with the family company Viessmann has drawn criticism, raised a lot of money, and, above all, raised questions.

Source excerpt · Bayern Strikes ↗
Read the original article ↗
Club news graphic. No source photo available.
Club graphic · no source photo available

From the source

Bundesliga clubs and investors: It has never been a straightforward or easy relationship. For years, organisations such as the German football association have been exploring ways to strike a reasonable balance, and have never found a way to perfectly balance between club ownership and outside ownership.

Germany has long operated under the much-discussed 50+1 rule. A rule that, in practice, ensures that outside investors never gain full control over the day-to-day running of a club.

Another often-cited aim of 50+1 is to prevent the financial gap between the elite and the mid-table clubs from widening further. Bayern Munich recently struck a lucrative deal with the family-owned company Viessmann.

At a glance

Reporting status
Reported
Original publisher
Bayern Strikes ↗
Source published
Clubs covered
Bayern Munich

Attributed publisher reporting. Kickjolly has not independently confirmed the claim.

How we label and update stories

Source context

This brief is drawn from Bayern Strikes. The original report is linked below for its complete context.

Read original report ↗

THE NEXT STORY STARTS HERE

Keep reading

More stories connected to this one. Find your next talking point.

All football →

The stands

0 comments

Have your say. Keep it about football. Guest comments are reviewed before appearing publicly.

Be the first to start the conversation.